Compared to traditional wired network connections, wireless network bridging offers numerous advantages, mainly in the following aspects:
1. Setting up a wireless bridge network does not require laying cables or digging trenches, resulting in faster network deployment. Links can be set up and added anytime, making installation and expansion convenient. Wired network deployment, on the other hand, requires digging trenches, is affected by terrain, and cannot be deployed arbitrarily, resulting in longer construction periods.
2. The quality of a typical wired network connection decreases sharply with the extension of the line. However, for point-to-point wireless bridging, there is almost no impact within 50 kilometers, and it can generally provide communication speeds from 1M to 11M.
3. Besides telecommunications companies, other organizations do not have the right to dig trenches and lay cables in urban areas for their communication systems; however, wireless bridging allows for flexible customization of dedicated networks based on customer needs.
4. Maintaining wired links requires checking along the entire line, and it is generally difficult to quickly locate the fault point when a problem occurs. Wireless bridging communication only requires maintaining the spread-spectrum radio, allowing for quick identification of the cause of the fault and restoration of normal operation.
5. Wireless bridge networks can quickly (within tens of minutes) establish communication links, enabling temporary, emergency, and disaster relief communication, while wired network connections require a much longer time.
In summary, wireless bridging communication surpasses traditional wired network connections in many aspects, including reliability, availability, and resilience, especially demonstrating its superiority in certain challenging geographical environments.